Saturday, November 28, 2009

Medellin Colombia Soccer Officials 'laundered drug money" says report


Eleven former officials of Colombian football club Independiente Medellin were charged on Tuesday with using it to launder drug money.Among those charged were Rodrigo Tamayo, club president in 1998-2000 and 2004, Tamayo's wife, Dolly Cardenas, and two other former presidents, Mario de J. Valderrama and Luis Fernando Jimenez. Conviction carries a prison term of six to 15 years.

Prosecutor Cesar Velez, using estimates from the club's former auditor Juan Bautista Avalos Salgar, estimated Tamayo laundered $4.6 million during his terms as president.

Avalos Salgar said one way of laundering money would be to sell a player for, say US$100, but enter the transaction on the books as $1,000. This means the extra $900 entered on the books was money gained allegedly through drug trafficking.

Posted by Michael Hearns from www.launderingmoney.com and http://launderingmoney.blogspot.com

Saturday, November 21, 2009

Pennsylvania lawyer guilty on money laundering charges


By Matt Birkbeck
The Morning Call

Attorney John P. Karoly Jr. wrote a $500,000 check to a Lehigh County charity, took a tax deduction and used the money for personal and business expenses after steering it to a private foundation he controlled, a federal judge ruled Thursday.

In finding Karoly guilty of six counts of money laundering and three counts of mail fraud, U.S. District Judge Lawrence F. Stengel said Karoly ''knowingly and willfully'' participated in a scheme to defraud the Lehigh Valley Community Foundation and Dubbs Memorial United Church of Christ in Allentown.

''The evidence demonstrated very clearly that Mr. Karoly created a scheme to defraud,'' Stengel wrote in a 49-page decision.

Karoly, 59, of South Whitehall Township, pleaded guilty in July to failing to pay taxes on $5.2 million in income. Now that he has been convicted of all counts in the money laundering case, he could face up to nine years in prison and more than $2 million in fines.

He could not be reached for comment Thursday. His attorney, Robert E. Goldman of Bucks County, did not return calls for comment.

Stengel issued his decision eight weeks after testimony ended in a four-day, nonjury trial in Philadelphia in which Karoly testified he believed his money, given to the LVCF in December 2004, was merely being held ''in escrow.''

Karoly maintained the $500,000 was his to spend. He wanted the LVCF to transfer the money to the private Urban Wilderness Foundation, which he controlled. He said the foundation owned land in the Poconos that was to be used by disadvantaged Allentown kids.

The LVCF refused to transfer the money after finding the Urban Wilderness Foundation was not a valid, tax-exempt organization. Karoly then directed LVCF to give the money to Dubbs church, which transferred it under his direction to the Urban Wilderness Foundation.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Seth Weber maintained that it was all a ruse by Karoly who, after taking a tax deduction on the money in 2006, simply sought to get the money back.

Weber charged that Karoly persuaded the pastor at Dubbs, where Karoly has been a member for years, to transfer the money to Karoly's foundation.

Stengel agreed, writing in his decision that Karoly ''set out to have his $500,000 charitable donation channeled back to him by using Dubbs Memorial UCC as a vehicle.''

Stengel cited several examples, including a bill of sale for the purchase of the Poconos property. Karoly gave the bill to prosecutors. It had an entity number the state assigned to the Urban Wilderness Foundation. The judge said the document was ''made up'' because the state didn't give Urban Wilderness an entity number until three months after the date of the agreement of sale.

''This falsification of a legal document to suit his own purposes and to lend support to his 'story' undermines Mr. Karoly's credibility generally and certainly renders his testimony about the purported sale of the [property]unbelievable,'' Stengel said.

The judge also said the 108-acre property in Luzerne County where Karoly testified he envisioned bringing poor Allentown kids was intended for Karoly's personal use. Stengel said the plans didn't show a lodge Karoly testified would house the youths. Instead, the plans showed rooms with labels that said ''den,'' ''gun room,'' ''racquetball court'' and ''wine cellar.''

''Mr. Karoly's testimony concerning the 'charitable purpose' of the work being done on theƂ…Luzerne County property is simply not credible,'' Stengel said.

The convictions could bring an end to a high-profile legal career in which Karoly has won millions in lawsuits, including suits against the Bethlehem and Easton police departments. Last week Karoly, representing the widow of a slain Easton police officer, settled a lawsuit against the city for $5 million.

Paul Killion, chief counsel for the Pennsylvania Disciplinary Board, which privately investigates and disciplines attorneys, has said that once Karoly is sentenced he faces immediate suspension of his law license and disbarment by the Supreme Court.

Karoly's sentencing date has not been scheduled.

Posted by Michael Hearns from www.launderingmoney.com and http://launderingmoney.blogspot.com

Thursday, November 19, 2009

San Francisco is last location in massive Ukranian money laundering case


A former Ukrainian prime minister was resentenced in federal court in San Francisco today to eight years and one month in prison for laundering $21.7 million in extorted funds through U.S. banks.

Pavel Lazarenko, 56, was prime minister in 1996 and 1997 and fled to the United States in 1999, where he later bought a $6.7 million house in Novato.

He was originally sentenced in 2006 to nine years in prison following his 2004 conviction on 14 money laundering and fraud counts.

The resentencing came after a federal appeals court last year overturned six of the counts, but upheld his conviction on eight counts of laundering money extorted from a Ukrainian businessman in the 1990s.

The six dismissed counts related to a separate alleged fraud of transferring to the United States $14 million in profits looted from a state-owned dairy farm in Ukraine.

Prosecutors said Lazarenko extorted the $21.7 million from Peter Kiritchenko beginning in 1992, when Lazarenko was a regional governor, until 1999, by requiring Kiritchenko to turn over half his profits from his agriculture and metals import and export company as a condition of doing business.

They said he laundered the money in a complex series of transactions that went through banks in Poland, Switzerland and Antigua and ended in banks in San Francisco.

U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer, in pronouncing the new sentence, said, "The message must go forward that the United States will not become a safe haven for funds that have been obtained with an illicit purpose."

Breyer also ordered Lazarenko to pay a $9 million fine and will hold a hearing later on how much restitution he must pay Kiritchenko.

Lazarenko told the judge, "In the past 10 years I have come to a full understanding. Every way that I personally could punish myself, I have punished myself. After my release I will go to the Ukraine to work hard and work honestly."

Lazarenko has been in custody for about half of the past decade, but was allowed release on home detention and an $86 million bond between June 2003 and October 2008.

A probation officer told Breyer at the hearing that the cost of a security task force to maintain the house arrest during that period was $850,000, paid by Lazarenko.

The former prime minister was sent back to a federal prison in Dublin on Oct. 1, 2008, after the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco on Sept. 26 upheld his conviction on the eight money laundering counts.

Defense attorney Dennis Riordan estimated that with credit for time served and good behavior, Lazarenko will serve between one year and six months and two years and eight months of additional prison time.

Lazarenko was only the second former foreign leader to be prosecuted in a U.S. court.
The first was deposed Gen. Manuel Noriega of Panama, who was convicted in federal court in Miami in 1992 of cocaine trafficking and sentenced to 30 years in prison.

Lazarenko's unusual case required prosecutors to prove both that the money laundering and other alleged crimes violated American law and that the money was gained illegally under Ukrainian law in effect at the time.

Defense lawyers argued that Lazarenko gained his vast wealth legally during a tumultuous time in the 1990s as Ukraine moved from a Communist to a capitalist economy.
Prosecutors charged he "engaged in massive abuse of both his public office and the United States' financial system."

Kiritchenko, who had moved to Sausalito in 1995, was a prosecution witness in Lazarenko's trial.

Lazarenko at one point faced a total of 53 U.S. criminal counts, but the case was pared down as it moved through the federal courts.

He was originally indicted in 2000 on 33 counts of laundering $114 million and in 2001, the charges were expanded to 53 counts related to $237 million he allegedly gained from extortion and bribes in Ukraine.

The charges included laundering the money extorted from Kiritchenko and transferring to the United States kickbacks allegedly taken from the dairy farm, a natural gas distribution company and a housing enterprise.

Midway through the 2004 trial, U.S. District Judge Martin Jenkins dismissed 24 wire fraud and transfer counts related to the alleged natural gas and housing kickbacks, saying that prosecutors hadn't proved Lazarenko's dealings on those projects violated Ukrainian law.
A jury convicted Lazarenko on 29 counts, but in 2005, Jenkins dismissed 15 other counts of wire fraud and transfer of stolen property, saying there wasn't enough evidence for those convictions.

Last year, a three-judge panel of the appeals court dismissed the six fraud and transfer counts related to alleged dairy farm kickbacks. The panel said allegedly fraudulent bank transfers in 1997 and 1998 were too remote in time from the alleged bribe payments in 1994.

The U.S. Supreme Court last month rejected Lazarenko's appeal of his conviction on the eight remaining money laundering counts.

The case was transferred to Breyer after Jenkins left the federal bench in 2008 to become a state appeals court judge.


Posted by Michael Hearns from www.launderingmoney.com and http://launderingmoney.blogspot.com